WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN AKP YEARS IN TURKEY: THE CONDITION OF ISLAMISM, TURKISH ISLAM SYNTHESIS, AND ISLAMIST VIOLENCE

  • Fatma Sündal Anadolu University, Turkey

Abstract

AKP (Justice and Development Party) can be accepted as the last and most powerful representative of Islamism in Turkey. The party came to power alone, after the general elections in 2002 and in 2007. Within its fi rst period of power, AKP claimed divergence from its extreme Islamist views and it gained trust among the majority of intellectuals. Furthermore, some socialist and liberal intellectuals supported most claims of AKP, in its fi rst period of power. In the second period, AKP’s discourse began to have references to şeria law, more frequently; and fi nally, it lost the support of liberals and socialists. We witnessed some important and mysterious assassinations in the years 2006 and 2007 before the 2007 elections; and pre-elections period of 2007 was characterised by legal issues, which put AKP in a ‘suff ering’ position, once more. This essay is an eff ort in re-evaluating the tension between Islamism and laicism and some political issues of AKP years of Turkey, including four chosen acts of violence against laicite defenders or non-Muslims.

Keywords: Secularisation of Consciousness, Islamism, Islamist Violence, Democracy, Türban Ban, Şeria Law, Turkish Islam Synthesis

References

Akşit, Bahattin, “Islamic Education in Turkey: Medrese Reform in Late-Ottoman Times and ImamHatip Schools in the Republic,” in Islam in Modern Turkey, ed. Richard Tapper (London: I. B. Tauris & Co. Ltd., 1991).
Berger, Peter L., The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion (Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company Inc., 1967).
Carroll, Anthony, “What is the Theory of Secularisation?,” Paper presented in the Scribani Conference Antwerp: Roundtable on Ethics and Faith (September 2004).
Gilsenan, Michael, Recognising Islam (London: Croom Helm, 1982).
Habermas, Jürgen, Glauben und Wissen. Friedenspreis des Deutschen Buchhandels, (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2001).
Heller, Agnes, Sociologia della Vita Quotidiana, [Sociology of Everyday Life] (trans.), Alberto Scarponi. (Roma: Ed. Riuniti, 1970).
Keddie, N. R., “Symbol and Sincerity in Islam”, Studia Islamica 19 (1963): 27-63.
Lambert, Yves, “Religion in Modernity as a New Axial Age: Secularization or New Religious Forms?,” Sociology of Religion 60:3 (1999): 303-333.
35 For the detailed description of the period, see Şerif Mardin, “Türkiye’de Din ve Laiklik,” in Makaleler 3: Türkiye’de Din ve Siyaset ed. Şerif Mardin [“Religion and Laicite in Turkey,” in The Articles 3: Religion and Politics in Turkey] (Istanbul: Iletişim, 1991), 40-5.
Mardin, Şerif, Din ve Ideoloji [Religion and Ideology] (Istanbul: Iletişim, 2000), [1969].
Mardin, Şerif “Türkiye’de Din ve Laiklik,” in Makaleler 3: Türkiye’de Din ve Siyaset ed.
Mardin, Şerif [“Religion and Laicite in Turkey,” in The Articles 3: Religion and Politics in Turkey] (Istanbul: Iletişim, 1991).
Mardin, Şerif “Türkiye’de Din ve Laiklik,” in Makaleler 3: Türkiye’de Din ve Siyaset ed. Şerif Mardin [“Religion and Laicite in Turkey,” in The Articles 3: Religion and Politics in Turkey] (Istanbul: Ýletişim,1991).
McLellan, David, Ideoloji [Ideology] (trans.) Ercüment Özkaya (Ankara: Doruk, 1999).
Nielsen, Jorgen S., Towards a European Islam, (New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc., 1999).
Özdalga, Elisabeth, Modern Türkiye’de Örtünme Sorunu, Resmi Laiklik ve Popüler Islam [The Veiling Issue, Offi cial Laicism, and Popular Islam in Modern Turkey] (Istanbul: Sarmal, 1998).
Vergin, Nur, “Toplumsal Degişme ve Dinsellikte Artiş,” Toplum ve Bilim [“Social Change and Increase in Religiosity” Society and Science] 29/39 (1985): 9-28.
Published
2017-01-14
Section
TOPIC OF THIS ISSUE