The Commodification of the Sacred: Thai Amulets in Contemporary Consumer Culture

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54561/prj1902308s

Keywords:

Thai amulets, cultural commodification, consumer behavior, marketing strategies, heritage preservation

Abstract

This study explores the transformation of Thai amulets from sacred artifacts into lifestyle products, focusing on four key objectives: (1) examining the evolution of amulet designs influenced by trends, fashion, and consumer preferences; (2) analyzing marketing strategies, including branding, storytelling, and digital distribution; (3) understanding shifting consumer behaviors and expectations within broader cultural changes; and (4) evaluating government perspectives and policies balancing commodification and cultural preservation. A mixed-method approach integrates existential phenomenology and constructivist grounded theory to provide a nuanced understanding of this transformation. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 25 participants, including designers, marketers, officials, and consumers; participant observation at amulet markets and on digital platforms like Facebook and TikTok; and document analysis of promotional materials and policies. The findings reveal significant evolution in amulet designs, incorporating minimalist aesthetics, luxury materials, and global fashion influences while retaining traditional motifs. Marketing strategies emphasize storytelling, celebrity endorsements, and social media engagement to reframe amulets as symbols of identity, cultural pride, and spiritual protection. Consumer behavior reflects a shift toward valuing amulets for aesthetic and status-related attributes, alongside spiritual meanings. Government agencies play a dual role in promoting amulets as cultural and economic assets while addressing concerns about preserving their sacredness. This research highlights the interplay between tradition, modernity, and market forces, offering insights into the commodification of cultural artifacts. Thai amulets exemplify how cultural heritage adapts to contemporary consumer demands while maintaining spiritual and cultural significance.

References

Agarwal, Ruchi, and Wiliam J. Jones. 2022. “Social media’s role in the changing religious landscape of contemporary Bangkok.” Religions 13, no. 5: 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13050421

Angrosino, Michael. 2007. Doing ethnographic and observational research. Sage Publications.

Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Belk, W. Russell. 1988. “Possessions and the extended self.” Journal of Consumer Research 15, no. 2: 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154

Bowen, A. Glenn. 2009. “Document analysis as a qualitative research method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9, no. 2: 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Chaffey, Dave, and Fiona Ellis-Chadwick. 2022. Digital marketing: Strategy, implementation, and practice (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.

Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Chotpittayanon, Natnicha; Jintalikhitdee, Vilasinee; Srikeaw, Paranee; Phasuk, Nutcha, and Surapong Siripongdee. 2025. “Spiritual Mutelu marketing: Enhancing value creation in Buddhist tourism in Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, Thailand.” Cogent Social Sciences 11, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2579968

Cruz, B. Gracia Angela; Seo, Yuri, and Daiane Scaraboto. 2024. “Between cultural appreciation and cultural appropriation: Self-authorizing the consumption of cultural difference.” Journal of Consumer Research 50, no. 5: 962–984. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucad022

Cohen, Eric. 2022. “Religious commodification in Southeast Asia.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 25, no. 4: 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779211027448

Fan, Kuo-Kuang, and Yu-Chu Wang. 2023. “Exploring the cultural meaning of Thai Buddha amulets.” AIP Conference Proceedings 2702, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0132758

Jackson, A. Peter. 1999. “The Enchanting Spirit of Thai Capitalism: The Cult of Luang Phor Khoon and the Post-modernisation of Thai Buddhism.” South East Asia Research 7, no. 1: 5–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967828X9900700102

Kitiarsa, Pattana. 2005. “Beyond Syncretism: Hybridization of Popular Religion in Contemporary Thailand.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 36, no. 3: 461–487. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463405000251

Kotler, Philip; Kartajaya, Hermawan, and Iwan Setiwan. 2021. Marketing 5.0: Technology for humanity. Wiley.

Kvale, Steinar. 1996. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications.

Lim Chiu, Candy; Ho, Han-Chiang; Xie, Zhengqiao; Wu, Qi, and Yuqi, Yuan. 2024. “Culturally mixed co-branding product framing in China: The role of cultural sensitivity, product quality, and purchase probability.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02954-1

Lincoln, S. Yvonna and E.G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of perception. Routledge: London.

Naepimai, Nattakarn, and Somrak Chaisingkananont. 2023. “Globalizing Thai amulets: The Chinese-Singaporean role in commoditizing objects of faith.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 24, no. 5: 898-912. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2023.2242154

Patton, Quinn Michael. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Spiegelberg, Herbert. 1975. Doing phenomenology: Essays on and in phenomenology. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

van Manen, Max. 1997. Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). Routledge.

van Manen, Max. 2016. Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge.

Vlieger de Oliveira, Sophia Elizabeth; Wache, Catalina, and Sascha Raithel. 2024. “The role of possessions for the extended self of sustainability-concerned anti-consumers.” AMS Review 14, 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-024-00286-6

Downloads

Published

2025-11-22

How to Cite

Siriwong, P., & Khamsa-ard, S. (2025). The Commodification of the Sacred: Thai Amulets in Contemporary Consumer Culture. Politics and Religion Journal, 19(2), 308–324. https://doi.org/10.54561/prj1902308s